Scan report for penofol.by
1 pages crawled — 1120 words, 56 images and 379 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 48 distinct problems found, counted 49 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-11-01
Category scores
- Overall
- 77/100
- SEO
- 64/100 · Issues: 8
- Accessibility
- 13/100 · Issues: 12
- Performance
- 79/100 · Issues: 7
- Security
- 46/100 · Issues: 10
- Privacy
- 85/100 · Issues: 3
- HTML validity
- 91/100 · Issues: 1
- Forms
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Links
- 97/100 · Issues: 1
- Console
- 73/100 · Issues: 3
- Infrastructure
- 97/100 · Issues: 1
- Mobile
- 82/100 · Issues: 2
- Images
- 97/100 · Issues: 1
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Show a visible focus indicator — Keyboard users can see where they are on the page.
- Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
- Give every button an accessible name — Every control announces what it does instead of being read out as a button.
- Set font-display: swap on the web fonts — Text is readable in a fallback face from the first paint instead of being hidden.
- Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.
- Label every form field — Fields become usable with a screen reader and clickable by their label.
What the site checks found
- Medium — SEO — A URL that does not exist answers with HTTP 200 — search engines index missing pages as real ones.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
- Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
- Low — Privacy — The site loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Yandex Metrica with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.
- Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, imprint).
- Low — Infrastructure — Requests from outside a browser are answered by bot protection rather than by the site, so the pages and files in this report were read in a real browser and the checks that cannot be asked that way are reported as not checked.
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.