Scan report for paulex-techno.bitrix24.site
4 pages crawled — 545 words, 6 images and 43 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 47 distinct problems found, counted 93 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-10-30
Category scores
- Overall
- 87/100
- SEO
- 66/100 · Issues: 26
- Accessibility
- 85/100 · Issues: 7
- Performance
- 84/100 · Issues: 16
- Security
- 41/100 · Issues: 32
- Privacy
- 91/100 · Issues: 1
- HTML validity
- 99/100 · Issues: 2
- Forms
- 99/100 · Issues: 1
- Links
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Console
- 98/100 · Issues: 1
- Infrastructure
- 92/100 · Issues: 2
- Mobile
- 99/100 · Issues: 2
- Images
- 93/100 · Issues: 3
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Name the mobile menu button — Screen-reader users hear "Menu" instead of an unnamed button.
- Add an H1 heading — Both readers and crawlers get a clear statement of what the page is about.
- Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
- Load the first image eagerly — The largest image starts downloading with the page instead of after it.
- Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
- Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
What the site checks found
- Low — SEO — Pages the crawl found that the sitemap does not list: 2 of 3 — crawlers have to reach them through links alone.
- Low — SEO — The http:// redirect is temporary (HTTP 302) — make it a 301 so ranking signals move across.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Medium — Security — No SPF record — anyone can send email that claims to come from this domain.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
- Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
- Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, terms, imprint).
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.