Scan report for paslenbel.by
5 pages crawled — 455 words, 5 images and 65 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 30 distinct problems found, counted 93 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-11-01
Category scores
- Overall
- 88/100
- SEO
- 47/100 · Issues: 25
- Accessibility
- 98/100 · Issues: 1
- Performance
- 77/100 · Issues: 22
- Security
- 52/100 · Issues: 34
- Privacy
- 91/100 · Issues: 1
- HTML validity
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Forms
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Links
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Console
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Infrastructure
- 97/100 · Issues: 5
- Mobile
- 97/100 · Issues: 5
- Images
- 100/100 · No issues found
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Stop robots.txt from disallowing the whole site — Search engines are allowed to read the site at all.
- Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
- Write meta descriptions for the pages without one — Google stops inventing snippets and shows the copy you wrote.
- Update the copyright year — The footer stops telling everyone the site was abandoned.
- Set font-display: swap on the web fonts — Text is readable in a fallback face from the first paint instead of being hidden.
- Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
What the site checks found
- Critical — SEO — robots.txt disallows crawling of the home page — search engines are shut out of the site.
- Low — SEO — robots.txt has no Sitemap: line — crawlers have to guess where the sitemap is.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
- Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
- Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, terms, imprint).
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.