Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for parketmarket.by

5 pages crawled — 5588 words, 71 images and 659 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 69 distinct problems found, counted 249 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-11-01

Category scores

Overall
73/100
SEO
60/100 · Issues: 30
Accessibility
23/100 · Issues: 51
Performance
67/100 · Issues: 41
Security
4/100 · Issues: 55
Privacy
85/100 · Issues: 7
HTML validity
88/100 · Issues: 10
Forms
79/100 · Issues: 25
Links
94/100 · Issues: 10
Console
91/100 · Issues: 5
Infrastructure
94/100 · Issues: 6
Mobile
96/100 · Issues: 7
Images
99/100 · Issues: 2

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Declare the page language on the <html> element — Screen readers pick the right pronunciation and translation tools work.
  • Let the viewport be zoomed — Anyone who needs larger text can zoom the page.
  • Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
  • Give every button an accessible name — Every control announces what it does instead of being read out as a button.
  • Set font-display: swap on the web fonts — Text is readable in a fallback face from the first paint instead of being hidden.
  • Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.

What the site checks found

  • Low — SEO — The http:// redirect is temporary (HTTP 302) — make it a 301 so ranking signals move across.
  • Medium — SEO — Both www.parketmarket.by and the canonical host serve the site with HTTP 200 — the whole site exists at two addresses.
  • Medium — SEO — A URL that does not exist answers with HTTP 200 — search engines index missing pages as real ones.
  • Medium — Security — The server lists the contents of /i/ instead of refusing — every file ever uploaded there is browsable.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
  • Medium — Performance — 2 of 8 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
  • Low — Privacy — The site loads Google Analytics, Google Ads, Yandex Metrica with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.
  • Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, terms, imprint).
  • Low — Infrastructure — Requests from outside a browser are answered by bot protection rather than by the site, so the pages and files in this report were read in a real browser and the checks that cannot be asked that way are reported as not checked.

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.