Scan report for orthos.org
5 pages crawled — 6061 words, 102 images and 514 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 45 distinct problems found, counted 125 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-10-26
Category scores
- Overall
- 85/100
- SEO
- 80/100 · Issues: 33
- Accessibility
- 66/100 · Issues: 28
- Performance
- 71/100 · Issues: 12
- Security
- 31/100 · Issues: 30
- Privacy
- 91/100 · Issues: 1
- HTML validity
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Forms
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Links
- 97/100 · Issues: 5
- Console
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Infrastructure
- 94/100 · Issues: 10
- Mobile
- 98/100 · Issues: 1
- Images
- 97/100 · Issues: 5
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Add alt text to the images that are missing it — Search engines can index the images and screen-reader users learn what they show.
- Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
- Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.
- Serve every asset over https:// — Browsers stop blocking assets and warning about the padlock.
- Add a twitter:card meta tag — Links shared on X get a preview card instead of a bare URL.
- Send a Permissions-Policy header — Camera, microphone and geolocation stay switched off for embedded content.
What the site checks found
- Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
- Medium — Performance — 10 of 18 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
- Medium — Performance — 9 scripts or stylesheets are sent without gzip or Brotli compression.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Medium — Security — SPF records published: 2. The standard allows exactly one, and receivers discard all of them.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
- Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
- Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, terms, imprint).
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.