Scan report for notix.by
5 pages crawled — 4899 words, 111 images and 378 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 54 distinct problems found, counted 206 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-10-28
Category scores
- Overall
- 78/100
- SEO
- 86/100 · Issues: 20
- Accessibility
- 45/100 · Issues: 45
- Performance
- 73/100 · Issues: 23
- Security
- 25/100 · Issues: 45
- Privacy
- 94/100 · Issues: 6
- HTML validity
- 81/100 · Issues: 11
- Forms
- 61/100 · Issues: 35
- Links
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Console
- 91/100 · Issues: 5
- Infrastructure
- 97/100 · Issues: 1
- Mobile
- 88/100 · Issues: 10
- Images
- 97/100 · Issues: 5
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Give every form a submit control — Visitors can actually send the form.
- Add alt text to the images that are missing it — Search engines can index the images and screen-reader users learn what they show.
- Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
- Give every button an accessible name — Every control announces what it does instead of being read out as a button.
- Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
- Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
What the site checks found
- Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
- Medium — Performance — 8 of 10 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Medium — Security — No SPF record — anyone can send email that claims to come from this domain.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
- Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
- Low — Infrastructure — The domain publishes no MX records, so it cannot receive email.
- Low — Privacy — The site loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Yandex Metrica with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.