Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for nol.by

5 pages crawled — 2362 words, 11 images and 71 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 33 distinct problems found, counted 58 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-11-03

Category scores

Overall
90/100
SEO
62/100 · Issues: 18
Accessibility
98/100 · Issues: 1
Performance
87/100 · Issues: 3
Security
47/100 · Issues: 29
Privacy
100/100 · No issues found
HTML validity
100/100 · No issues found
Forms
100/100 · No issues found
Links
100/100 · No issues found
Console
98/100 · Issues: 1
Infrastructure
90/100 · Issues: 4
Mobile
99/100 · Issues: 1
Images
98/100 · Issues: 1

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
  • Point the canonical link at this page — The page keeps its own ranking signals instead of handing them to another address.
  • Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
  • Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
  • Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.
  • Send a Permissions-Policy header — Camera, microphone and geolocation stay switched off for embedded content.

What the site checks found

  • Low — SEO — Sitemap URLs pointing at a different domain: 76 — they will be ignored.
  • Low — SEO — No entry in the sitemap carries a lastmod date, so crawlers cannot tell which pages have changed since they last read them.
  • Medium — SEO — Both www.nol.by and the canonical host serve the site with HTTP 200 — the whole site exists at two addresses.
  • Medium — SEO — 5 hreflang links are not confirmed by a link back from the other language: /docs → /docs/ (en), /docs → /es/docs/ (es), /docs → /pt/docs/ (pt-br). Google ignores one-way pairs.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Medium — Security — No SPF record — anyone can send email that claims to come from this domain.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
  • Medium — Performance — 8 of 15 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with zstd but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • Low — Infrastructure — The domain publishes no MX records, so it cannot receive email.

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.