Scan report for newtechnologies.by
5 pages crawled — 3641 words, 24 images and 120 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 39 distinct problems found, counted 110 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-10-26
Category scores
- Overall
- 82/100
- SEO
- 74/100 · Issues: 17
- Accessibility
- 73/100 · Issues: 19
- Performance
- 80/100 · Issues: 15
- Security
- 3/100 · Issues: 27
- Privacy
- 86/100 · Issues: 6
- HTML validity
- 98/100 · Issues: 4
- Forms
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Links
- 91/100 · Issues: 1
- Console
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Infrastructure
- 92/100 · Issues: 9
- Mobile
- 90/100 · Issues: 8
- Images
- 93/100 · Issues: 4
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Declare the page language on the <html> element — Screen readers pick the right pronunciation and translation tools work.
- Add the responsive viewport meta tag — The layout adapts to phones instead of being zoomed out.
- Add an H1 heading — Both readers and crawlers get a clear statement of what the page is about.
- Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
- Add alt text to the images that are missing it — Search engines can index the images and screen-reader users learn what they show.
- Replace the legacy doctype with <!DOCTYPE html> — The page renders in standards mode in every browser.
What the site checks found
- Low — SEO — robots.txt has no Sitemap: line — crawlers have to guess where the sitemap is.
- Medium — SEO — No sitemap.xml found at either the conventional paths or the one robots.txt names.
- High — Security — http:// does not redirect to https:// — the plain-text address stays reachable.
- Medium — Security — The server answers TRACE by echoing the request back, cookies and Authorization header included.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Medium — Security — No SPF record — anyone can send email that claims to come from this domain.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
- Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
- Medium — Performance — 18 of 18 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
- Medium — Links — Internal links leading to an error page: 1 of 10 checked.
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.