Scan report for newhatka.by
5 pages crawled — 4243 words, 172 images and 869 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 61 distinct problems found, counted 204 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-10-27
Category scores
- Overall
- 81/100
- SEO
- 66/100 · Issues: 34
- Accessibility
- 48/100 · Issues: 46
- Performance
- 65/100 · Issues: 36
- Security
- 40/100 · Issues: 42
- Privacy
- 100/100 · No issues found
- HTML validity
- 97/100 · Issues: 5
- Forms
- 97/100 · Issues: 5
- Links
- 96/100 · Issues: 7
- Console
- 77/100 · Issues: 13
- Infrastructure
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Mobile
- 95/100 · Issues: 6
- Images
- 88/100 · Issues: 10
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Name the mobile menu button — Screen-reader users hear "Menu" instead of an unnamed button.
- Give every button an accessible name — Every control announces what it does instead of being read out as a button.
- Set font-display: swap on the web fonts — Text is readable in a fallback face from the first paint instead of being hidden.
- Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
- Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
- Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.
What the site checks found
- Low — SEO — robots.txt has no Sitemap: line — crawlers have to guess where the sitemap is.
- Medium — SEO — No sitemap.xml found at either the conventional paths or the one robots.txt names.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
- Medium — Performance — 5 of 12 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
- Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.