Scan report for mysttc.ru
5 pages crawled — 2292 words, 242 images and 178 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 63 distinct problems found, counted 169 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-11-03
Category scores
- Overall
- 80/100
- SEO
- 50/100 · Issues: 36
- Accessibility
- 53/100 · Issues: 26
- Performance
- 84/100 · Issues: 8
- Security
- 35/100 · Issues: 38
- Privacy
- 91/100 · Issues: 1
- HTML validity
- 86/100 · Issues: 21
- Forms
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Links
- 99/100 · Issues: 2
- Console
- 98/100 · Issues: 1
- Infrastructure
- 90/100 · Issues: 17
- Mobile
- 86/100 · Issues: 13
- Images
- 92/100 · Issues: 6
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Declare the page language on the <html> element — Screen readers pick the right pronunciation and translation tools work.
- Add the responsive viewport meta tag — The layout adapts to phones instead of being zoomed out.
- Add alt text to the images that are missing it — Search engines can index the images and screen-reader users learn what they show.
- Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
- Write meta descriptions for the pages without one — Google stops inventing snippets and shows the copy you wrote.
- Replace the legacy doctype with <!DOCTYPE html> — The page renders in standards mode in every browser.
What the site checks found
- Low — SEO — robots.txt has no Sitemap: line — crawlers have to guess where the sitemap is.
- Medium — SEO — No sitemap.xml found at either the conventional paths or the one robots.txt names.
- Medium — SEO — Both www.mysttc.ru and the canonical host serve the site with HTTP 200 — the whole site exists at two addresses.
- Medium — Security — The server lists the contents of /data1221/ instead of refusing — every file ever uploaded there is browsable.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
- Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
- Medium — Performance — 18 of 18 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
- Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, imprint).
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.