Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for msq-monolit.by

5 pages crawled — 1091 words, 105 images and 119 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 61 distinct problems found, counted 162 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-11-01

Category scores

Overall
81/100
SEO
42/100 · Issues: 42
Accessibility
65/100 · Issues: 29
Performance
80/100 · Issues: 14
Security
32/100 · Issues: 38
Privacy
88/100 · Issues: 2
HTML validity
96/100 · Issues: 6
Forms
98/100 · Issues: 4
Links
98/100 · Issues: 4
Console
91/100 · Issues: 5
Infrastructure
90/100 · Issues: 7
Mobile
93/100 · Issues: 7
Images
98/100 · Issues: 4

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
  • Declare the page language on the <html> element — Screen readers pick the right pronunciation and translation tools work.
  • Set font-display: swap on the web fonts — Text is readable in a fallback face from the first paint instead of being hidden.
  • Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
  • Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
  • Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.

What the site checks found

  • Low — SEO — No robots.txt — crawlers get no guidance and no sitemap pointer.
  • Medium — SEO — No sitemap.xml found at either the conventional paths or the one robots.txt names.
  • Low — SEO — The http:// redirect is temporary (HTTP 302) — make it a 301 so ranking signals move across.
  • Medium — SEO — Both www.msq-monolit.by and the canonical host serve the site with HTTP 200 — the whole site exists at two addresses.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Medium — Security — No SPF record — anyone can send email that claims to come from this domain.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
  • Medium — Performance — 13 of 13 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • Low — Privacy — The site loads Yandex Metrica with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.
  • Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, terms, imprint).

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.