Scan report for montajnik.by
5 pages crawled — 2203 words, 217 images and 721 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 49 distinct problems found, counted 137 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-10-27
Category scores
- Overall
- 84/100
- SEO
- 73/100 · Issues: 25
- Accessibility
- 64/100 · Issues: 27
- Performance
- 83/100 · Issues: 11
- Security
- 50/100 · Issues: 34
- Privacy
- 88/100 · Issues: 2
- HTML validity
- 87/100 · Issues: 11
- Forms
- 96/100 · Issues: 2
- Links
- 98/100 · Issues: 4
- Console
- 84/100 · Issues: 9
- Infrastructure
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Mobile
- 90/100 · Issues: 10
- Images
- 99/100 · Issues: 2
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Declare the page language on the <html> element — Screen readers pick the right pronunciation and translation tools work.
- Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
- Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
- Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.
- Make every id on the page unique — Anchors, labels and scripts reach the element they were pointing at.
- Give every iframe a title — Screen-reader users hear what each embedded frame contains.
What the site checks found
- Low — SEO — No entry in the sitemap carries a lastmod date, so crawlers cannot tell which pages have changed since they last read them.
- Medium — SEO — Both www.montajnik.by and the canonical host serve the site with HTTP 200 — the whole site exists at two addresses.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
- Medium — Performance — 4 of 4 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Low — Security — Response headers publish exact software versions: server: Microsoft-IIS/10.0.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
- Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
- Low — Privacy — The site loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Ads, Yandex Metrica with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.
- Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, terms, imprint).
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.