Scan report for monomarplus.by
5 pages crawled — 1088 words, 34 images and 199 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 29 distinct problems found, counted 75 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-11-03
Category scores
- Overall
- 91/100
- SEO
- 86/100 · Issues: 20
- Accessibility
- 98/100 · Issues: 2
- Performance
- 88/100 · Issues: 12
- Security
- 40/100 · Issues: 36
- Privacy
- 91/100 · Issues: 1
- HTML validity
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Forms
- 99/100 · Issues: 2
- Links
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Console
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Infrastructure
- 97/100 · Issues: 1
- Mobile
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Images
- 98/100 · Issues: 1
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
- Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
- Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
- Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.
- Send a Permissions-Policy header — Camera, microphone and geolocation stay switched off for embedded content.
- Write meta descriptions for the pages without one — Google stops inventing snippets and shows the copy you wrote.
What the site checks found
- Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Low — Security — Response headers publish exact software versions: server: nginx/1.30.6, x-powered-by: PHP/8.3.36.
- Medium — Security — No SPF record — anyone can send email that claims to come from this domain.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
- Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
- Low — Infrastructure — The domain publishes no MX records, so it cannot receive email.
- Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, terms, imprint).
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.