Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for mmmm.by

5 pages crawled — 3592 words, 59 images and 248 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 28 distinct problems found, counted 71 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-10-30

Category scores

Overall
90/100
SEO
80/100 · Issues: 23
Accessibility
92/100 · Issues: 6
Performance
82/100 · Issues: 8
Security
43/100 · Issues: 20
Privacy
100/100 · No issues found
HTML validity
99/100 · Issues: 2
Forms
98/100 · Issues: 1
Links
97/100 · Issues: 5
Console
100/100 · No issues found
Infrastructure
97/100 · Issues: 1
Mobile
100/100 · No issues found
Images
97/100 · Issues: 5

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Write meta descriptions for the pages without one — Google stops inventing snippets and shows the copy you wrote.
  • Serve every asset over https:// — Browsers stop blocking assets and warning about the padlock.
  • Add alt text to the images that are missing it — Search engines can index the images and screen-reader users learn what they show.
  • Send a Permissions-Policy header — Camera, microphone and geolocation stay switched off for embedded content.
  • Introduce a Content-Security-Policy — Injected scripts stop being able to run.
  • Shorten the over-long titles — The whole title stays visible in search results.

What the site checks found

  • Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
  • Medium — Performance — 12 of 12 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Medium — Security — No SPF record — anyone can send email that claims to come from this domain.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
  • Low — Infrastructure — The domain publishes no MX records, so it cannot receive email.

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.