Scan report for mirigr.by
5 pages crawled — 4349 words, 152 images and 1187 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 34 distinct problems found, counted 83 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-10-31
Category scores
- Overall
- 89/100
- SEO
- 79/100 · Issues: 17
- Accessibility
- 79/100 · Issues: 14
- Performance
- 92/100 · Issues: 3
- Security
- 43/100 · Issues: 35
- Privacy
- 91/100 · Issues: 1
- HTML validity
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Forms
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Links
- 97/100 · Issues: 1
- Console
- 98/100 · Issues: 1
- Infrastructure
- 97/100 · Issues: 1
- Mobile
- 97/100 · Issues: 5
- Images
- 93/100 · Issues: 5
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
- Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
- Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
- Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.
- Load the first image eagerly — The largest image starts downloading with the page instead of after it.
- Label every form field — Fields become usable with a screen reader and clickable by their label.
What the site checks found
- Low — SEO — No entry in the sitemap carries a lastmod date, so crawlers cannot tell which pages have changed since they last read them.
- Medium — SEO — Both www.mirigr.by and the canonical host serve the site with HTTP 200 — the whole site exists at two addresses.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Medium — Security — No SPF record — anyone can send email that claims to come from this domain.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
- Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
- Low — Links — Internal links that reach their page through a redirect: 1 of 10 checked.
- Low — Infrastructure — The domain publishes no MX records, so it cannot receive email.
- Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, terms, imprint).
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.