Scan report for mirespresso.by
5 pages crawled — 7756 words, 442 images and 1221 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 62 distinct problems found, counted 186 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-11-03
Category scores
- Overall
- 79/100
- SEO
- 60/100 · Issues: 12
- Accessibility
- 27/100 · Issues: 56
- Performance
- 74/100 · Issues: 33
- Security
- 22/100 · Issues: 49
- Privacy
- 94/100 · Issues: 6
- HTML validity
- 88/100 · Issues: 10
- Forms
- 95/100 · Issues: 3
- Links
- 95/100 · Issues: 8
- Console
- 98/100 · Issues: 1
- Infrastructure
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Mobile
- 96/100 · Issues: 3
- Images
- 97/100 · Issues: 5
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Stop robots.txt from disallowing the whole site — Search engines are allowed to read the site at all.
- Add alt text to the images that are missing it — Search engines can index the images and screen-reader users learn what they show.
- Give every button an accessible name — Every control announces what it does instead of being read out as a button.
- Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
- Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
- Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.
What the site checks found
- Critical — SEO — robots.txt disallows crawling of the home page — search engines are shut out of the site.
- Low — SEO — robots.txt has no Sitemap: line — crawlers have to guess where the sitemap is.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
- Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
- Low — Privacy — The site loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel, Yandex Metrica with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.