Scan report for minskslonim.by
4 pages crawled — 1322 words, 45 images and 77 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 44 distinct problems found, counted 116 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-10-26
Category scores
- Overall
- 80/100
- SEO
- 56/100 · Issues: 35
- Accessibility
- 64/100 · Issues: 15
- Performance
- 70/100 · Issues: 4
- Security
- 0/100 · Issues: 40
- Privacy
- 91/100 · Issues: 1
- HTML validity
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Forms
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Links
- 97/100 · Issues: 4
- Console
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Infrastructure
- 94/100 · Issues: 8
- Mobile
- 96/100 · Issues: 5
- Images
- 97/100 · Issues: 4
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Let the viewport be zoomed — Anyone who needs larger text can zoom the page.
- Add alt text to the images that are missing it — Search engines can index the images and screen-reader users learn what they show.
- Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
- Update the copyright year — The footer stops telling everyone the site was abandoned.
- Give every button an accessible name — Every control announces what it does instead of being read out as a button.
- Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
What the site checks found
- Low — SEO — robots.txt has no Sitemap: line — crawlers have to guess where the sitemap is.
- Medium — SEO — No sitemap.xml found at either the conventional paths or the one robots.txt names.
- High — Security — http:// does not redirect to https:// — the plain-text address stays reachable.
- Critical — Security — Files a deploy should never publish are readable over the web: /.DS_Store.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Low — Security — Response headers publish exact software versions: server: Apache/2.4.29 (Ubuntu).
- Medium — Security — No SPF record — anyone can send email that claims to come from this domain.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Medium — Performance — 10 of 10 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
- Medium — Performance — 4 scripts or stylesheets are sent without gzip or Brotli compression.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
- Medium — Performance — 1 of the images sampled are over half a megabyte: /images/phone.png?2 (1267 KB).
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.