Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for millecenta.com

5 pages crawled — 3098 words, 39 images and 660 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 33 distinct problems found, counted 90 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-10-29

Category scores

Overall
89/100
SEO
83/100 · Issues: 14
Accessibility
87/100 · Issues: 8
Performance
81/100 · Issues: 14
Security
37/100 · Issues: 36
Privacy
85/100 · Issues: 7
HTML validity
97/100 · Issues: 5
Forms
100/100 · No issues found
Links
97/100 · Issues: 5
Console
100/100 · No issues found
Infrastructure
100/100 · No issues found
Mobile
100/100 · No issues found
Images
99/100 · Issues: 1

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
  • Write meta descriptions for the pages without one — Google stops inventing snippets and shows the copy you wrote.
  • Give every button an accessible name — Every control announces what it does instead of being read out as a button.
  • Set font-display: swap on the web fonts — Text is readable in a fallback face from the first paint instead of being hidden.
  • Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
  • Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.

What the site checks found

  • Low — SEO — Pages the crawl found that the sitemap does not list: 4 of 5 — crawlers have to reach them through links alone.
  • Low — Performance — Redirects before the entry page is served: 3.
  • Medium — Performance — 1 scripts or stylesheets are sent without gzip or Brotli compression.
  • Low — Security — The Content-Security-Policy sets no default-src, object-src, base-uri, frame-ancestors, so those are left at the browser default.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Low — Security — Response headers publish exact software versions: x-powered-by: PHP/7.4.33.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
  • Low — Privacy — The site loads Google Analytics, Yandex Metrica with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.
  • Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, terms, imprint).

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.