Scan report for maxcr.ru
5 pages crawled — 7628 words, 84 images and 1192 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 44 distinct problems found, counted 123 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-10-29
Category scores
- Overall
- 87/100
- SEO
- 65/100 · Issues: 25
- Accessibility
- 78/100 · Issues: 22
- Performance
- 87/100 · Issues: 16
- Security
- 46/100 · Issues: 40
- Privacy
- 97/100 · Issues: 1
- HTML validity
- 81/100 · Issues: 11
- Forms
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Links
- 97/100 · Issues: 5
- Console
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Infrastructure
- 99/100 · Issues: 1
- Mobile
- 99/100 · Issues: 1
- Images
- 99/100 · Issues: 1
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Add the <!DOCTYPE html> declaration — Browsers switch from quirks mode to standards mode — the layout stops drifting between them.
- Let the viewport be zoomed — Anyone who needs larger text can zoom the page.
- Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
- Set font-display: swap on the web fonts — Text is readable in a fallback face from the first paint instead of being hidden.
- Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
- Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
What the site checks found
- Low — SEO — The sitemap lists no URLs at all.
- Medium — SEO — Both www.maxcr.ru and the canonical host serve the site with HTTP 200 — the whole site exists at two addresses.
- Medium — SEO — A URL that does not exist answers with HTTP 200 — search engines index missing pages as real ones.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Low — Security — Response headers publish exact software versions: server: nginx-reuseport/1.21.1.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
- Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
- Low — Privacy — The site loads Yandex Metrica with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.