Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for luxvisage.by

5 pages crawled — 2150 words, 150 images and 629 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 56 distinct problems found, counted 181 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-10-28

Category scores

Overall
81/100
SEO
85/100 · Issues: 21
Accessibility
47/100 · Issues: 34
Performance
78/100 · Issues: 28
Security
33/100 · Issues: 46
Privacy
85/100 · Issues: 7
HTML validity
82/100 · Issues: 10
Forms
67/100 · Issues: 27
Links
99/100 · Issues: 1
Console
100/100 · No issues found
Infrastructure
100/100 · No issues found
Mobile
99/100 · Issues: 2
Images
97/100 · Issues: 5

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Declare the page language on the <html> element — Screen readers pick the right pronunciation and translation tools work.
  • Add the <!DOCTYPE html> declaration — Browsers switch from quirks mode to standards mode — the layout stops drifting between them.
  • Give every form a submit control — Visitors can actually send the form.
  • Add alt text to the images that are missing it — Search engines can index the images and screen-reader users learn what they show.
  • Name the mobile menu button — Screen-reader users hear "Menu" instead of an unnamed button.
  • Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.

What the site checks found

  • Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Low — Security — Response headers publish exact software versions: server: nginx/1.16.1.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
  • Low — Privacy — The site loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel, Yandex Metrica with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.
  • Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, terms, imprint).

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.