Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for libfin.by

5 pages crawled — 5334 words, 111 images and 352 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 40 distinct problems found, counted 121 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-10-26

Category scores

Overall
89/100
SEO
85/100 · Issues: 21
Accessibility
83/100 · Issues: 17
Performance
63/100 · Issues: 29
Security
57/100 · Issues: 26
Privacy
97/100 · Issues: 5
HTML validity
96/100 · Issues: 2
Forms
93/100 · Issues: 11
Links
99/100 · Issues: 1
Console
100/100 · No issues found
Infrastructure
97/100 · Issues: 1
Mobile
96/100 · Issues: 5
Images
98/100 · Issues: 3

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
  • Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
  • Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.
  • Label every form field — Fields become usable with a screen reader and clickable by their label.
  • Give every button an accessible name — Every control announces what it does instead of being read out as a button.
  • Give every link readable text — Screen-reader users hear where a link goes instead of "link".

What the site checks found

  • Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
  • Medium — Performance — 2 of 8 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Low — Security — Response headers publish exact software versions: server: nginx/1.30.4, x-powered-by: PHP/8.2.34.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
  • Low — Infrastructure — Requests from outside a browser are answered by bot protection rather than by the site, so the pages and files in this report were read in a real browser and the checks that cannot be asked that way are reported as not checked.

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.