Scan report for legadd.by
1 pages crawled — 348 words, 2 images and 17 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 38 distinct problems found, counted 38 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-10-26
Category scores
- Overall
- 84/100
- SEO
- 55/100 · Issues: 7
- Accessibility
- 49/100 · Issues: 7
- Performance
- 73/100 · Issues: 9
- Security
- 49/100 · Issues: 11
- Privacy
- 88/100 · Issues: 2
- HTML validity
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Forms
- 97/100 · Issues: 1
- Links
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Console
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Infrastructure
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Mobile
- 97/100 · Issues: 1
- Images
- 100/100 · No issues found
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Toggle aria-expanded on the menu button — Screen readers announce whether the menu is open or closed.
- Show a visible focus indicator — Keyboard users can see where they are on the page.
- Add an H1 heading — Both readers and crawlers get a clear statement of what the page is about.
- Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
- Write meta descriptions for the pages without one — Google stops inventing snippets and shows the copy you wrote.
- Give every button an accessible name — Every control announces what it does instead of being read out as a button.
What the site checks found
- Low — SEO — robots.txt has no Sitemap: line — crawlers have to guess where the sitemap is.
- Medium — SEO — No sitemap.xml found at either the conventional paths or the one robots.txt names.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
- Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
- Low — Privacy — The site loads Yandex Metrica with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.
- Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, terms, imprint).
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.