Scan report for lam.by
5 pages crawled — 9104 words, 527 images and 2530 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 60 distinct problems found, counted 159 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-11-01
Category scores
- Overall
- 81/100
- SEO
- 59/100 · Issues: 22
- Accessibility
- 51/100 · Issues: 44
- Performance
- 76/100 · Issues: 22
- Security
- 33/100 · Issues: 36
- Privacy
- 88/100 · Issues: 2
- HTML validity
- 89/100 · Issues: 9
- Forms
- 93/100 · Issues: 7
- Links
- 98/100 · Issues: 3
- Console
- 95/100 · Issues: 3
- Infrastructure
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Mobile
- 94/100 · Issues: 6
- Images
- 97/100 · Issues: 5
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Give every button an accessible name — Every control announces what it does instead of being read out as a button.
- Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
- Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
- Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.
- Label every form field — Fields become usable with a screen reader and clickable by their label.
- Add alt text to the images that are missing it — Search engines can index the images and screen-reader users learn what they show.
What the site checks found
- Low — SEO — robots.txt has no Sitemap: line — crawlers have to guess where the sitemap is.
- Medium — SEO — The sitemap is not valid XML, so crawlers cannot read it.
- Medium — SEO — Both www.lam.by and the canonical host serve the site with HTTP 200 — the whole site exists at two addresses.
- Medium — SEO — A URL that does not exist answers with HTTP 200 — search engines index missing pages as real ones.
- High — Security — http:// does not redirect to https:// — the plain-text address stays reachable.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
- Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
- Medium — Performance — 16 of 16 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
- Low — Privacy — The site loads Yandex Metrica with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.