Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for kiselev.jp

5 pages crawled — 20662 words, 367 images and 665 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 59 distinct problems found, counted 200 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-10-30

Category scores

Overall
78/100
SEO
59/100 · Issues: 41
Accessibility
44/100 · Issues: 41
Performance
75/100 · Issues: 23
Security
24/100 · Issues: 41
Privacy
85/100 · Issues: 7
HTML validity
77/100 · Issues: 20
Forms
97/100 · Issues: 5
Links
99/100 · Issues: 1
Console
84/100 · Issues: 9
Infrastructure
100/100 · No issues found
Mobile
95/100 · Issues: 6
Images
95/100 · Issues: 6

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Declare the page language on the <html> element — Screen readers pick the right pronunciation and translation tools work.
  • Add alt text to the images that are missing it — Search engines can index the images and screen-reader users learn what they show.
  • Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
  • Write meta descriptions for the pages without one — Google stops inventing snippets and shows the copy you wrote.
  • Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.
  • Label every form field — Fields become usable with a screen reader and clickable by their label.

What the site checks found

  • Low — SEO — Pages the crawl found that the sitemap does not list: 3 of 5 — crawlers have to reach them through links alone.
  • Medium — SEO — Both www.kiselev.jp and the canonical host serve the site with HTTP 200 — the whole site exists at two addresses.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Medium — Security — SPF records published: 2. The standard allows exactly one, and receivers discard all of them.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
  • Medium — Performance — 18 of 18 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • Low — Privacy — The site loads Google Analytics, Meta Pixel, Yandex Metrica with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.
  • Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, terms, imprint).

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.