Scan report for juniline.com
1 pages crawled — 439 words, 17 images and 9 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 37 distinct problems found, counted 38 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-10-31
Category scores
- Overall
- 81/100
- SEO
- 49/100 · Issues: 9
- Accessibility
- 61/100 · Issues: 4
- Performance
- 79/100 · Issues: 3
- Security
- 31/100 · Issues: 13
- Privacy
- 91/100 · Issues: 1
- HTML validity
- 82/100 · Issues: 2
- Forms
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Links
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Console
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Infrastructure
- 91/100 · Issues: 3
- Mobile
- 88/100 · Issues: 2
- Images
- 97/100 · Issues: 1
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Add the responsive viewport meta tag — The layout adapts to phones instead of being zoomed out.
- Add an H1 heading — Both readers and crawlers get a clear statement of what the page is about.
- Add alt text to the images that are missing it — Search engines can index the images and screen-reader users learn what they show.
- Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
- Write meta descriptions for the pages without one — Google stops inventing snippets and shows the copy you wrote.
- Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
What the site checks found
- Low — SEO — No robots.txt — crawlers get no guidance and no sitemap pointer.
- Medium — SEO — No sitemap.xml found at either the conventional paths or the one robots.txt names.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
- Medium — Performance — 8 of 8 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
- Medium — Performance — 5 of the images sampled are over half a megabyte: /images/projects/MI_moskovski_1.jpg (1063 KB), /images/projects/MI_moskovski_2.jpg (849 KB), /images/projects/NA_tyrkompl_1.jpg (809 KB), /images/projects/NA_tyrkompl_2.jpg (1094 KB), /images/projects/OR_AZS.jpg (887 KB).
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Low — Security — Response headers publish exact software versions: server: Microsoft-IIS/10.0.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
- Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
- Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, imprint).
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.