Scan report for isobud.com
5 pages crawled — 1517 words, 40 images and 366 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 16 distinct problems found, counted 35 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-11-02
Category scores
- Overall
- 94/100
- SEO
- 98/100 · Issues: 4
- Accessibility
- 91/100 · Issues: 13
- Performance
- 70/100 · Issues: 8
- Security
- 70/100 · Issues: 10
- Privacy
- 100/100 · No issues found
- HTML validity
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Forms
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Links
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Console
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Infrastructure
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Mobile
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Images
- 100/100 · No issues found
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Turn on gzip or brotli compression for HTML — HTML transfers shrink by roughly 70%, cutting load time on every visit.
- Give every link readable text — Screen-reader users hear where a link goes instead of "link".
- Introduce a Content-Security-Policy — Injected scripts stop being able to run.
- Compress scripts and stylesheets — Scripts and stylesheets transfer at a fraction of their size.
- Add a skip link to the main content — Keyboard users reach the content without tabbing through the whole menu.
- Shorten the over-long titles — The whole title stays visible in search results.
What the site checks found
- Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
- Medium — Performance — 10 of 10 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
- Medium — Performance — 4 scripts or stylesheets are sent without gzip or Brotli compression.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Low — Security — Response headers publish exact software versions: server: nginx/1.30.6.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
- Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.