Scan report for interiorhall.by
5 pages crawled — 676 words, 72 images and 198 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 52 distinct problems found, counted 155 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-10-26
Category scores
- Overall
- 76/100
- SEO
- 61/100 · Issues: 27
- Accessibility
- 61/100 · Issues: 29
- Performance
- 70/100 · Issues: 14
- Security
- 0/100 · Issues: 43
- Privacy
- 86/100 · Issues: 6
- HTML validity
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Forms
- 74/100 · Issues: 8
- Links
- 98/100 · Issues: 4
- Console
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Infrastructure
- 83/100 · Issues: 15
- Mobile
- 98/100 · Issues: 4
- Images
- 80/100 · Issues: 5
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Declare the page language on the <html> element — Screen readers pick the right pronunciation and translation tools work.
- Add an H1 heading — Both readers and crawlers get a clear statement of what the page is about.
- Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
- Write meta descriptions for the pages without one — Google stops inventing snippets and shows the copy you wrote.
- Give every button an accessible name — Every control announces what it does instead of being read out as a button.
- Turn on gzip or brotli compression for HTML — HTML transfers shrink by roughly 70%, cutting load time on every visit.
What the site checks found
- Low — SEO — No robots.txt — crawlers get no guidance and no sitemap pointer.
- Medium — SEO — No sitemap.xml found at either the conventional paths or the one robots.txt names.
- High — Security — http:// does not redirect to https:// — the plain-text address stays reachable.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Low — Security — Response headers publish exact software versions: server: nginx/1.20.2, x-powered-by: PHP/5.6.40.
- Medium — Security — No SPF record — anyone can send email that claims to come from this domain.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Medium — Performance — 9 of 9 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
- Medium — Performance — 6 scripts or stylesheets are sent without gzip or Brotli compression.
- High — Images — Images that do not load: 5 of 8 checked — the pages show a broken picture where they were.
- Low — Infrastructure — The icon the pages declare answers HTTP 404, so tabs and bookmarks fall back to a blank page symbol.
- Low — Infrastructure — The domain publishes no MX records, so it cannot receive email.
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.