Scan report for intekostroy.by
4 pages crawled — 3182 words, 180 images and 468 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 36 distinct problems found, counted 79 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-10-31
Category scores
- Overall
- 88/100
- SEO
- 46/100 · Issues: 33
- Accessibility
- 96/100 · Issues: 4
- Performance
- 94/100 · Issues: 2
- Security
- 61/100 · Issues: 24
- Privacy
- 91/100 · Issues: 1
- HTML validity
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Forms
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Links
- 98/100 · Issues: 1
- Console
- 98/100 · Issues: 1
- Infrastructure
- 87/100 · Issues: 6
- Mobile
- 97/100 · Issues: 4
- Images
- 93/100 · Issues: 3
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Load the first image eagerly — The largest image starts downloading with the page instead of after it.
- Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
- Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
- Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.
- Add a favicon — The site gets its own icon in tabs, bookmarks and history.
- Make each page title unique — Pages stop competing with each other for the same query.
What the site checks found
- Low — SEO — robots.txt has no Sitemap: line — crawlers have to guess where the sitemap is.
- Medium — SEO — No sitemap.xml found at either the conventional paths or the one robots.txt names.
- Medium — SEO — Both www.intekostroy.by and the canonical host serve the site with HTTP 200 — the whole site exists at two addresses.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
- Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
- Low — Infrastructure — The icon the pages declare answers HTTP 404, so tabs and bookmarks fall back to a blank page symbol.
- Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, terms, imprint).
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.