Scan report for inexpert.by
5 pages crawled — 2357 words, 48 images and 193 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 56 distinct problems found, counted 165 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-10-27
Category scores
- Overall
- 81/100
- SEO
- 73/100 · Issues: 17
- Accessibility
- 56/100 · Issues: 30
- Performance
- 78/100 · Issues: 28
- Security
- 33/100 · Issues: 43
- Privacy
- 88/100 · Issues: 2
- HTML validity
- 86/100 · Issues: 14
- Forms
- 97/100 · Issues: 5
- Links
- 79/100 · Issues: 6
- Console
- 87/100 · Issues: 7
- Infrastructure
- 97/100 · Issues: 1
- Mobile
- 94/100 · Issues: 10
- Images
- 99/100 · Issues: 2
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Add alt text to the images that are missing it — Search engines can index the images and screen-reader users learn what they show.
- Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
- Name the mobile menu button — Screen-reader users hear "Menu" instead of an unnamed button.
- Give every button an accessible name — Every control announces what it does instead of being read out as a button.
- Set font-display: swap on the web fonts — Text is readable in a fallback face from the first paint instead of being hidden.
- Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
What the site checks found
- Low — SEO — robots.txt has no Sitemap: line — crawlers have to guess where the sitemap is.
- Medium — SEO — No sitemap.xml found at either the conventional paths or the one robots.txt names.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with zstd but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Medium — Security — No SPF record — anyone can send email that claims to come from this domain.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
- Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
- High — Links — Internal links leading to an error page: 10 of 10 checked.
- Low — Infrastructure — The domain publishes no MX records, so it cannot receive email.
- Low — Privacy — The site loads Google Analytics with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.