Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for hram-vitebsk.cerkov.ru

5 pages crawled — 3527 words, 37 images and 698 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 45 distinct problems found, counted 147 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-11-03

Category scores

Overall
85/100
SEO
74/100 · Issues: 29
Accessibility
71/100 · Issues: 36
Performance
81/100 · Issues: 10
Security
10/100 · Issues: 51
Privacy
97/100 · Issues: 1
HTML validity
99/100 · Issues: 2
Forms
100/100 · No issues found
Links
97/100 · Issues: 5
Console
98/100 · Issues: 1
Infrastructure
94/100 · Issues: 10
Mobile
98/100 · Issues: 1
Images
99/100 · Issues: 1

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
  • Write meta descriptions for the pages without one — Google stops inventing snippets and shows the copy you wrote.
  • Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
  • Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
  • Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.
  • Serve every asset over https:// — Browsers stop blocking assets and warning about the padlock.

What the site checks found

  • Low — SEO — robots.txt has no Sitemap: line — crawlers have to guess where the sitemap is.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
  • Medium — Performance — 10 of 18 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Low — Security — Response headers publish exact software versions: x-powered-by: PHP/5.6.40.
  • Medium — Security — SPF records published: 2. The standard allows exactly one, and receivers discard all of them.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
  • Low — Privacy — The site loads Yandex Metrica with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.