Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for gravital.by

5 pages crawled — 1067 words, 62 images and 115 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 38 distinct problems found, counted 117 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-10-31

Category scores

Overall
87/100
SEO
63/100 · Issues: 32
Accessibility
97/100 · Issues: 5
Performance
77/100 · Issues: 17
Security
39/100 · Issues: 37
Privacy
91/100 · Issues: 1
HTML validity
86/100 · Issues: 4
Forms
100/100 · No issues found
Links
99/100 · Issues: 2
Console
100/100 · No issues found
Infrastructure
97/100 · Issues: 5
Mobile
95/100 · Issues: 9
Images
97/100 · Issues: 5

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Write meta descriptions for the pages without one — Google stops inventing snippets and shows the copy you wrote.
  • Update the copyright year — The footer stops telling everyone the site was abandoned.
  • Set font-display: swap on the web fonts — Text is readable in a fallback face from the first paint instead of being hidden.
  • Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
  • Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
  • Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.

What the site checks found

  • Low — SEO — robots.txt has no Sitemap: line — crawlers have to guess where the sitemap is.
  • Medium — SEO — No sitemap.xml found at either the conventional paths or the one robots.txt names.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
  • Medium — Performance — 18 of 18 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • Medium — Security — The server lists the contents of /wp-content/uploads/2015/12/ instead of refusing — every file ever uploaded there is browsable.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Low — Security — Response headers publish exact software versions: x-powered-by: PHP/5.4.16.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
  • Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, imprint).

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.