Scan report for gnblogistic.by
5 pages crawled — 1432 words, 19 images and 88 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 47 distinct problems found, counted 178 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-11-01
Category scores
- Overall
- 79/100
- SEO
- 59/100 · Issues: 47
- Accessibility
- 79/100 · Issues: 18
- Performance
- 82/100 · Issues: 8
- Security
- 31/100 · Issues: 40
- Privacy
- 91/100 · Issues: 1
- HTML validity
- 98/100 · Issues: 4
- Forms
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Links
- 97/100 · Issues: 5
- Console
- 28/100 · Issues: 40
- Infrastructure
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Mobile
- 83/100 · Issues: 14
- Images
- 99/100 · Issues: 1
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Add the responsive viewport meta tag — The layout adapts to phones instead of being zoomed out.
- Add alt text to the images that are missing it — Search engines can index the images and screen-reader users learn what they show.
- Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
- Add an H1 heading — Both readers and crawlers get a clear statement of what the page is about.
- Update the copyright year — The footer stops telling everyone the site was abandoned.
- Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
What the site checks found
- Low — SEO — No robots.txt — crawlers get no guidance and no sitemap pointer.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
- Medium — Performance — 10 of 10 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Low — Security — Response headers publish exact software versions: server: nginx/1.30.6.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
- Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
- Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, terms, imprint).
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.