Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for gkh.lida.by

5 pages crawled — 3694 words, 120 images and 841 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 42 distinct problems found, counted 117 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-10-26

Category scores

Overall
88/100
SEO
83/100 · Issues: 18
Accessibility
70/100 · Issues: 25
Performance
77/100 · Issues: 17
Security
40/100 · Issues: 39
Privacy
100/100 · No issues found
HTML validity
96/100 · Issues: 6
Forms
100/100 · No issues found
Links
97/100 · Issues: 5
Console
100/100 · No issues found
Infrastructure
100/100 · No issues found
Mobile
99/100 · Issues: 2
Images
97/100 · Issues: 5

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Add alt text to the images that are missing it — Search engines can index the images and screen-reader users learn what they show.
  • Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
  • Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
  • Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.
  • Serve every asset over https:// — Browsers stop blocking assets and warning about the padlock.
  • Write meta descriptions for the pages without one — Google stops inventing snippets and shows the copy you wrote.

What the site checks found

  • Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
  • Medium — Performance — 3 of 18 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.