Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for gexpert.by

5 pages crawled — 3976 words, 333 images and 491 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 43 distinct problems found, counted 142 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-10-27

Category scores

Overall
83/100
SEO
71/100 · Issues: 21
Accessibility
71/100 · Issues: 23
Performance
71/100 · Issues: 12
Security
34/100 · Issues: 40
Privacy
98/100 · Issues: 4
HTML validity
92/100 · Issues: 8
Forms
89/100 · Issues: 15
Links
91/100 · Issues: 1
Console
100/100 · No issues found
Infrastructure
91/100 · Issues: 11
Mobile
100/100 · No issues found
Images
93/100 · Issues: 7

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
  • Write meta descriptions for the pages without one — Google stops inventing snippets and shows the copy you wrote.
  • Give every button an accessible name — Every control announces what it does instead of being read out as a button.
  • Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
  • Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
  • Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.

What the site checks found

  • Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
  • Medium — Performance — 18 of 18 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • Medium — Performance — 1 of the images sampled are over half a megabyte: /wp-content/themes/guardexpert/img/h1.png (1755 KB).
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Medium — Security — No SPF record — anyone can send email that claims to come from this domain.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
  • Medium — Links — Internal links leading to an error page: 1 of 10 checked.
  • Low — SEO — Internal links that differ from the address the server serves only by a trailing slash, and are redirected on every visit: 3.
  • Low — Infrastructure — The domain publishes no MX records, so it cannot receive email.

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.