Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for generalinter.by

5 pages crawled — 2890 words, 86 images and 592 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 33 distinct problems found, counted 82 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-10-27

Category scores

Overall
91/100
SEO
89/100 · Issues: 19
Accessibility
86/100 · Issues: 12
Performance
80/100 · Issues: 12
Security
57/100 · Issues: 20
Privacy
98/100 · Issues: 4
HTML validity
98/100 · Issues: 4
Forms
90/100 · Issues: 6
Links
100/100 · No issues found
Console
100/100 · No issues found
Infrastructure
100/100 · No issues found
Mobile
100/100 · No issues found
Images
97/100 · Issues: 5

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
  • Label every form field — Fields become usable with a screen reader and clickable by their label.
  • Give every form a submit control — Visitors can actually send the form.
  • Add rel="noopener" to target="_blank" links — External tabs can no longer reach back into the opener window.
  • Add loading="lazy" to the embedded frames — Embedded players and maps load when they are scrolled to, not before the page has painted.
  • Expand the very short meta descriptions — A fuller snippet gives searchers a reason to click.

What the site checks found

  • Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • Medium — Performance — 1 of the images sampled are over half a megabyte: /uploads/news/akcionnye-ceny-na-renault-laguna-1-1997-k9126/medium-6adb238554f32.png (1612 KB).
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Medium — Security — No SPF record — anyone can send email that claims to come from this domain.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.