Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for gazgomel.by

5 pages crawled — 2502 words, 312 images and 850 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 51 distinct problems found, counted 155 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-10-25

Category scores

Overall
82/100
SEO
47/100 · Issues: 27
Accessibility
67/100 · Issues: 32
Performance
75/100 · Issues: 23
Security
31/100 · Issues: 40
Privacy
85/100 · Issues: 7
HTML validity
96/100 · Issues: 6
Forms
100/100 · No issues found
Links
100/100 · No issues found
Console
100/100 · No issues found
Infrastructure
100/100 · No issues found
Mobile
93/100 · Issues: 10
Images
88/100 · Issues: 10

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Add an H1 heading — Both readers and crawlers get a clear statement of what the page is about.
  • Give every button an accessible name — Every control announces what it does instead of being read out as a button.
  • Set font-display: swap on the web fonts — Text is readable in a fallback face from the first paint instead of being hidden.
  • Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
  • Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
  • Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.

What the site checks found

  • Low — SEO — robots.txt has no Sitemap: line — crawlers have to guess where the sitemap is.
  • Medium — SEO — The sitemap is not valid XML, so crawlers cannot read it.
  • Medium — SEO — Both www.gazgomel.by and the canonical host serve the site with HTTP 200 — the whole site exists at two addresses.
  • Medium — SEO — A URL that does not exist answers with HTTP 200 — search engines index missing pages as real ones.
  • High — Security — http:// does not redirect to https:// — the plain-text address stays reachable.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
  • Medium — Performance — 16 of 16 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • Low — Privacy — The site loads Google Analytics, Yandex Metrica with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.