Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for forallgroup.by

1 pages crawled — 1733 words, 23 images and 46 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 46 distinct problems found, counted 49 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-10-30

Category scores

Overall
78/100
SEO
67/100 · Issues: 7
Accessibility
28/100 · Issues: 9
Performance
70/100 · Issues: 10
Security
49/100 · Issues: 11
Privacy
88/100 · Issues: 2
HTML validity
67/100 · Issues: 4
Forms
91/100 · Issues: 3
Links
100/100 · No issues found
Console
82/100 · Issues: 2
Infrastructure
100/100 · No issues found
Mobile
91/100 · Issues: 1
Images
100/100 · No issues found

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Name the mobile menu button — Screen-reader users hear "Menu" instead of an unnamed button.
  • Toggle aria-expanded on the menu button — Screen readers announce whether the menu is open or closed.
  • Show a visible focus indicator — Keyboard users can see where they are on the page.
  • Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
  • Give every button an accessible name — Every control announces what it does instead of being read out as a button.
  • Set font-display: swap on the web fonts — Text is readable in a fallback face from the first paint instead of being hidden.

What the site checks found

  • Low — SEO — robots.txt has no Sitemap: line — crawlers have to guess where the sitemap is.
  • Medium — SEO — No sitemap.xml found at either the conventional paths or the one robots.txt names.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
  • Low — Privacy — The site loads Yandex Metrica with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.
  • Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, imprint).

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.