Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for flatcom.by

4 pages crawled — 2651 words, 184 images and 104 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 65 distinct problems found, counted 152 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-10-30

Category scores

Overall
80/100
SEO
57/100 · Issues: 34
Accessibility
59/100 · Issues: 24
Performance
81/100 · Issues: 15
Security
20/100 · Issues: 41
Privacy
85/100 · Issues: 6
HTML validity
90/100 · Issues: 4
Forms
99/100 · Issues: 2
Links
96/100 · Issues: 4
Console
84/100 · Issues: 7
Infrastructure
94/100 · Issues: 5
Mobile
91/100 · Issues: 8
Images
99/100 · Issues: 2

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Let the viewport be zoomed — Anyone who needs larger text can zoom the page.
  • Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
  • Add alt text to the images that are missing it — Search engines can index the images and screen-reader users learn what they show.
  • Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
  • Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
  • Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.

What the site checks found

  • Low — SEO — No robots.txt — crawlers get no guidance and no sitemap pointer.
  • Low — SEO — Pages the crawl found that the sitemap does not list: 2 of 4 — crawlers have to reach them through links alone.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Low — Security — Response headers publish exact software versions: server: Microsoft-IIS/10.0.
  • Medium — Security — No SPF record — anyone can send email that claims to come from this domain.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
  • Medium — Performance — 13 of 13 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
  • Low — Infrastructure — The domain publishes no MX records, so it cannot receive email.
  • Low — Privacy — The site loads Google Analytics, Yandex Metrica, Google Ads with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.
  • Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, imprint).

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.