Scan report for fireshot.by
5 pages crawled — 1156 words, 54 images and 207 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 38 distinct problems found, counted 128 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-10-26
Category scores
- Overall
- 87/100
- SEO
- 78/100 · Issues: 21
- Accessibility
- 92/100 · Issues: 9
- Performance
- 76/100 · Issues: 18
- Security
- 52/100 · Issues: 34
- Privacy
- 91/100 · Issues: 1
- HTML validity
- 92/100 · Issues: 13
- Forms
- 95/100 · Issues: 4
- Links
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Console
- 71/100 · Issues: 16
- Infrastructure
- 94/100 · Issues: 10
- Mobile
- 99/100 · Issues: 2
- Images
- 100/100 · No issues found
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
- Set font-display: swap on the web fonts — Text is readable in a fallback face from the first paint instead of being hidden.
- Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
- Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
- Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.
- Write meta descriptions for the pages without one — Google stops inventing snippets and shows the copy you wrote.
What the site checks found
- Low — SEO — robots.txt has no Sitemap: line — crawlers have to guess where the sitemap is.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
- Medium — Performance — 18 of 18 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
- Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
- Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, terms, imprint).
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.