Scan report for farkop.by

1 pages crawled — 60 words, 2 images and 4 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 33 distinct problems found, counted 34 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-10-27

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
Set font-display: swap on the web fonts — Text is readable in a fallback face from the first paint instead of being hidden.
Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.
Cache static files for a year — Returning visitors load scripts, styles and images from cache instead of the network.

What the site checks found

Low — SEO — No robots.txt — crawlers get no guidance and no sitemap pointer.
Medium — SEO — The sitemap is not valid XML, so crawlers cannot read it.
Medium — SEO — Both www.farkop.by and the canonical host serve the site with HTTP 200 — the whole site exists at two addresses.
Medium — SEO — A URL that does not exist answers with HTTP 200 — search engines index missing pages as real ones.
Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
Medium — Performance — 3 of 3 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
Medium — Security — No SPF record — anyone can send email that claims to come from this domain.
Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
Low — Infrastructure — The domain publishes no MX records, so it cannot receive email.

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.

Scan report for farkop.by

Category scores

Quick Wins

What the site checks found

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Cookies on SiteScan.top