Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for evrotoc.by

5 pages crawled — 3243 words, 89 images and 365 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 52 distinct problems found, counted 132 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-10-26

Category scores

Overall
87/100
SEO
74/100 · Issues: 27
Accessibility
78/100 · Issues: 17
Performance
74/100 · Issues: 21
Security
49/100 · Issues: 39
Privacy
87/100 · Issues: 3
HTML validity
96/100 · Issues: 6
Forms
99/100 · Issues: 2
Links
100/100 · No issues found
Console
96/100 · Issues: 2
Infrastructure
97/100 · Issues: 5
Mobile
94/100 · Issues: 8
Images
99/100 · Issues: 2

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Let the viewport be zoomed — Anyone who needs larger text can zoom the page.
  • Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
  • Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
  • Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.
  • Add a favicon — The site gets its own icon in tabs, bookmarks and history.
  • Preconnect to the origins the page loads assets from — The DNS, TCP and TLS work for the other origins happens while the HTML is still parsing.

What the site checks found

  • Medium — SEO — No sitemap.xml found at either the conventional paths or the one robots.txt names.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
  • Medium — Performance — 3 of 11 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
  • Low — Privacy — The site loads Google Analytics, Yandex Metrica with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.
  • Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, terms, imprint).

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.