Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for eva.by

5 pages crawled — 8919 words, 25 images and 158 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 39 distinct problems found, counted 106 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-11-02

Category scores

Overall
89/100
SEO
64/100 · Issues: 24
Accessibility
95/100 · Issues: 5
Performance
78/100 · Issues: 29
Security
49/100 · Issues: 39
Privacy
88/100 · Issues: 2
HTML validity
95/100 · Issues: 4
Forms
99/100 · Issues: 2
Links
100/100 · No issues found
Console
100/100 · No issues found
Infrastructure
100/100 · No issues found
Mobile
98/100 · Issues: 1
Images
100/100 · No issues found

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Add an H1 heading — Both readers and crawlers get a clear statement of what the page is about.
  • Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
  • Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
  • Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
  • Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.
  • Write meta descriptions for the pages without one — Google stops inventing snippets and shows the copy you wrote.

What the site checks found

  • Low — SEO — robots.txt has no Sitemap: line — crawlers have to guess where the sitemap is.
  • Medium — SEO — No sitemap.xml found at either the conventional paths or the one robots.txt names.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
  • Low — Privacy — The site loads Yandex Metrica with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.
  • Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, imprint).

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.