Scan report for etline.by
5 pages crawled — 22591 words, 212 images and 5222 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 44 distinct problems found, counted 158 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-10-31
Category scores
- Overall
- 82/100
- SEO
- 68/100 · Issues: 28
- Accessibility
- 77/100 · Issues: 25
- Performance
- 63/100 · Issues: 30
- Security
- 34/100 · Issues: 35
- Privacy
- 91/100 · Issues: 1
- HTML validity
- 91/100 · Issues: 5
- Forms
- 79/100 · Issues: 15
- Links
- 94/100 · Issues: 10
- Console
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Infrastructure
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Mobile
- 95/100 · Issues: 4
- Images
- 97/100 · Issues: 5
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
- Give every form a submit control — Visitors can actually send the form.
- Write meta descriptions for the pages without one — Google stops inventing snippets and shows the copy you wrote.
- Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
- Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
- Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.
What the site checks found
- Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
- Medium — Performance — 18 of 18 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Low — Security — Response headers publish exact software versions: x-powered-by: PHP/7.4.33.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
- Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
- Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, terms, imprint).
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.