Scan report for enricomarinelli.com
1 pages crawled — 141 words, 0 images and 13 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 35 distinct problems found, counted 35 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-11-02
Category scores
- Overall
- 82/100
- SEO
- 40/100 · Issues: 10
- Accessibility
- 34/100 · Issues: 6
- Performance
- 91/100 · Issues: 1
- Security
- 46/100 · Issues: 12
- Privacy
- 91/100 · Issues: 1
- HTML validity
- 97/100 · Issues: 1
- Forms
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Links
- 97/100 · Issues: 1
- Console
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Infrastructure
- 97/100 · Issues: 1
- Mobile
- 94/100 · Issues: 2
- Images
- 100/100 · No issues found
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Declare the page language on the <html> element — Screen readers pick the right pronunciation and translation tools work.
- Let the viewport be zoomed — Anyone who needs larger text can zoom the page.
- Add an H1 heading — Both readers and crawlers get a clear statement of what the page is about.
- Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
- Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
- Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
What the site checks found
- Low — SEO — No robots.txt — crawlers get no guidance and no sitemap pointer.
- Medium — SEO — The sitemap is not valid XML, so crawlers cannot read it.
- Medium — SEO — Both www.enricomarinelli.com and the canonical host serve the site with HTTP 200 — the whole site exists at two addresses.
- Medium — SEO — A URL that does not exist answers with HTTP 200 — search engines index missing pages as real ones.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Low — Security — Response headers publish exact software versions: server: Microsoft-IIS/10.0.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
- Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
- Medium — Performance — 10 of 10 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
- Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, terms, imprint).
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.