Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for dorsum.by

5 pages crawled — 4502 words, 160 images and 322 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 33 distinct problems found, counted 105 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-10-29

Category scores

Overall
90/100
SEO
85/100 · Issues: 11
Accessibility
82/100 · Issues: 20
Performance
93/100 · Issues: 12
Security
40/100 · Issues: 32
Privacy
96/100 · Issues: 6
HTML validity
94/100 · Issues: 10
Forms
97/100 · Issues: 5
Links
100/100 · No issues found
Console
98/100 · Issues: 1
Infrastructure
97/100 · Issues: 1
Mobile
98/100 · Issues: 2
Images
97/100 · Issues: 5

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
  • Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
  • Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.
  • Label every form field — Fields become usable with a screen reader and clickable by their label.
  • Add a twitter:card meta tag — Links shared on X get a preview card instead of a bare URL.
  • Give every iframe a title — Screen-reader users hear what each embedded frame contains.

What the site checks found

  • Medium — SEO — Stylesheets and scripts the pages load that robots.txt disallows: 5 of 12 — Googlebot renders the site without them.
  • Low — Security — Strict-Transport-Security asks for preload without the year of max-age and includeSubDomains the list requires.
  • Medium — Security — The server lists the contents of /wp-content/uploads/2026/06/ instead of refusing — every file ever uploaded there is browsable.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Medium — Security — SPF records published: 2. The standard allows exactly one, and receivers discard all of them.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
  • Low — Infrastructure — Requests from outside a browser are answered by bot protection rather than by the site, so the pages and files in this report were read in a real browser and the checks that cannot be asked that way are reported as not checked.

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.