Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for dirock.by

2 pages crawled — 32 words, 0 images and 0 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 30 distinct problems found, counted 31 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-10-26

Category scores

Overall
89/100
SEO
84/100 · Issues: 7
Accessibility
96/100 · Issues: 1
Performance
84/100 · Issues: 4
Security
34/100 · Issues: 12
Privacy
91/100 · Issues: 1
HTML validity
100/100 · No issues found
Forms
100/100 · No issues found
Links
96/100 · Issues: 1
Console
100/100 · No issues found
Infrastructure
87/100 · Issues: 4
Mobile
99/100 · Issues: 1
Images
100/100 · No issues found

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Let the viewport be zoomed — Anyone who needs larger text can zoom the page.
  • Redirect http:// to https:// — Visitors and crawlers land on the encrypted address every time.
  • Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
  • Write meta descriptions for the pages without one — Google stops inventing snippets and shows the copy you wrote.
  • Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
  • Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.

What the site checks found

  • High — Security — http:// does not redirect to https:// — the plain-text address stays reachable.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
  • Medium — Performance — 10 of 10 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, terms, imprint).

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.