Scan report for condik.by
1 pages crawled — 1047 words, 19 images and 45 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 39 distinct problems found, counted 39 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-11-01
Category scores
- Overall
- 81/100
- SEO
- 70/100 · Issues: 6
- Accessibility
- 16/100 · Issues: 10
- Performance
- 91/100 · Issues: 3
- Security
- 28/100 · Issues: 13
- Privacy
- 91/100 · Issues: 1
- HTML validity
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Forms
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Links
- 100/100 · No issues found
- Console
- 91/100 · Issues: 1
- Infrastructure
- 94/100 · Issues: 2
- Mobile
- 97/100 · Issues: 1
- Images
- 88/100 · Issues: 2
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Name the mobile menu button — Screen-reader users hear "Menu" instead of an unnamed button.
- Redirect http:// to https:// — Visitors and crawlers land on the encrypted address every time.
- Toggle aria-expanded on the menu button — Screen readers announce whether the menu is open or closed.
- Give every button an accessible name — Every control announces what it does instead of being read out as a button.
- Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
- Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
What the site checks found
- Low — SEO — No robots.txt — crawlers get no guidance and no sitemap pointer.
- Medium — SEO — No sitemap.xml found at either the conventional paths or the one robots.txt names.
- Medium — SEO — Both www.condik.by and the canonical host serve the site with HTTP 200 — the whole site exists at two addresses.
- High — Security — http:// does not redirect to https:// — the plain-text address stays reachable.
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Low — Security — Response headers publish exact software versions: server: nginx/1.30.6.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
- Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
- Medium — Images — Images that do not load: 1 of 8 checked — the pages show a broken picture where they were.
- Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, terms, imprint).
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.