Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for cnegovik.by

1 pages crawled — 2785 words, 168 images and 125 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 40 distinct problems found, counted 41 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-11-02

Category scores

Overall
79/100
SEO
55/100 · Issues: 9
Accessibility
49/100 · Issues: 7
Performance
64/100 · Issues: 6
Security
28/100 · Issues: 11
Privacy
88/100 · Issues: 2
HTML validity
100/100 · No issues found
Forms
97/100 · Issues: 1
Links
100/100 · No issues found
Console
100/100 · No issues found
Infrastructure
76/100 · Issues: 3
Mobile
97/100 · Issues: 1
Images
97/100 · Issues: 1

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Renew the domain registration — The domain is renewed before the site and its mail go dark.
  • Redirect http:// to https:// — Visitors and crawlers land on the encrypted address every time.
  • Show a visible focus indicator — Keyboard users can see where they are on the page.
  • Add alt text to the images that are missing it — Search engines can index the images and screen-reader users learn what they show.
  • Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
  • Compress scripts and stylesheets — Scripts and stylesheets transfer at a fraction of their size.

What the site checks found

  • Low — SEO — No robots.txt — crawlers get no guidance and no sitemap pointer.
  • Medium — SEO — The sitemap is not valid XML, so crawlers cannot read it.
  • Medium — SEO — Both www.cnegovik.by and the canonical host serve the site with HTTP 200 — the whole site exists at two addresses.
  • Medium — SEO — A URL that does not exist answers with HTTP 200 — search engines index missing pages as real ones.
  • High — Security — http:// does not redirect to https:// — the plain-text address stays reachable.
  • Medium — Security — The server lists the contents of /template/images/ instead of refusing — every file ever uploaded there is browsable.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
  • Medium — Performance — 13 of 13 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
  • Medium — Performance — 4 scripts or stylesheets are sent without gzip or Brotli compression.
  • High — Infrastructure — The domain registration expires in 3 days.

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.