Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for brestobl.com

5 pages crawled — 1815 words, 32 images and 405 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 37 distinct problems found, counted 102 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-11-03

Category scores

Overall
88/100
SEO
92/100 · Issues: 9
Accessibility
87/100 · Issues: 18
Performance
76/100 · Issues: 18
Security
36/100 · Issues: 39
Privacy
88/100 · Issues: 2
HTML validity
97/100 · Issues: 5
Forms
100/100 · No issues found
Links
91/100 · Issues: 1
Console
100/100 · No issues found
Infrastructure
100/100 · No issues found
Mobile
95/100 · Issues: 6
Images
93/100 · Issues: 4

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
  • Load the first image eagerly — The largest image starts downloading with the page instead of after it.
  • Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
  • Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
  • Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.
  • Give every iframe a title — Screen-reader users hear what each embedded frame contains.

What the site checks found

  • Low — SEO — No entry in the sitemap carries a lastmod date, so crawlers cannot tell which pages have changed since they last read them.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
  • Medium — Performance — 11 of 11 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Low — Security — Response headers publish exact software versions: x-powered-by: PHP/8.4.27.
  • Medium — Security — No SPF record — anyone can send email that claims to come from this domain.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
  • Medium — Links — Internal links leading to an error page: 1 of 10 checked.
  • Low — Privacy — The site loads Google Analytics, Google Ads, Yandex Metrica with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.
  • Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, imprint).

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.