Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for beltissuegroup.com

1 pages crawled — 463 words, 18 images and 7 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 25 distinct problems found, counted 25 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-11-02

Category scores

Overall
91/100
SEO
61/100 · Issues: 9
Accessibility
100/100 · No issues found
Performance
82/100 · Issues: 4
Security
61/100 · Issues: 9
Privacy
91/100 · Issues: 1
HTML validity
97/100 · Issues: 1
Forms
100/100 · No issues found
Links
100/100 · No issues found
Console
100/100 · No issues found
Infrastructure
100/100 · No issues found
Mobile
100/100 · No issues found
Images
97/100 · Issues: 1

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Write meta descriptions for the pages without one — Google stops inventing snippets and shows the copy you wrote.
  • Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
  • Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
  • Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.
  • Cache static files for a year — Returning visitors load scripts, styles and images from cache instead of the network.
  • Link the dead-end pages to the rest of the site — Visitors and crawlers who land on the page can go on to the rest of the site.

What the site checks found

  • Low — SEO — No entry in the sitemap carries a lastmod date, so crawlers cannot tell which pages have changed since they last read them.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
  • Medium — Performance — 6 of 10 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
  • Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, terms, imprint).

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.